Labelling AI-generated music.

Reviewed

Short answer

The EU AI Act does not require a label on every AI-generated song: the visible disclosure duty applies to deepfakes, and the Commission’s guidelines treat AI music resembling the individual style of existing artists as a deepfake that is part of an artistic work, which only needs a disclosure that does not hamper enjoyment. The provider of the music generator must still mark its audio in a machine-readable way, and platforms add their own rules, such as YouTube’s disclosure requirement for AI music that is the main focus of a video.

Official sources: Commission guidelines on Article 50, sections 4.1 and 6.1.3 · YouTube Help: Disclosing use of GenAI content

Who has which duty for AI music

AI music duties under Article 50
WhoDutyBasis
The company behind the music generatorMark its output in a machine-readable format, detectable as AI; the guidelines count speech, instrumental music and other audio as audioArticle 50(2)
An artist, label or brand releasing AI music that resembles existing artistsA deepfake within an artistic work: disclose in an appropriate way that does not hamper the display or enjoyment of the workArticle 50(4); guidelines section 6.1.3
Anyone, for fully AI-composed musicThe EU icons page lists “Fully AI-composed music or art” as a use of the “Fully AI-Generated” icon, with the note that it may enjoy the lighter disclosure for artistic worksEU icons page
A private person making songs for funNo AI Act dutyArticle 2(10)

The lighter regime still requires a disclosure. The Code of Practice (Section 2, Commitment 3) lets signatories place it in the accompanying notes or description, in the credits, or next to the audio player, provided people notice it without extra clicks. It also has to respect third parties’ rights: the guidelines say the artistic exception cannot justify ignoring copyright, related rights or data protection.

What streaming platforms say

AI music policies, from each platform's own page
PlatformWhat it saysSource
YouTubeCreators must disclose GenAI content that creates music that is the main focus of the video; AI-generated music may get a label in the video player.YouTube Help
SpotifySupports an industry standard for AI disclosures in music credits developed through DDEX and displays them as labels and distributors submit them; it says this is not about punishing artists who use AI responsibly or down-ranking tracks. Vocal impersonation is allowed only with the impersonated artist’s authorisation.Spotify, 25 September 2025
DeezerTags albums that include fully AI-generated tracks and, at the time of its announcement, excluded fully AI-generated tracks from algorithmic and editorial recommendations.Deezer, 20 June 2025

A practical routine for releases

  • Note per track where AI was used: vocals, instruments, lyrics, mixing or mastering.
  • Pass that through your distributor in the credits (Spotify displays the DDEX AI disclosures it receives).
  • If a track imitates a real artist’s voice or style, disclose it in the description or credits and get the rights you need.
  • On YouTube, tick the AI setting when AI music is the main focus of the video.
  • Keep the generator’s files and any Content Credentials or watermark it embedded.

Questions

Is AI music a deepfake?
It can be. The Commission’s guidelines give AI-generated music in any genre resembling the individual style of existing artists as an example of a deepfake that is part of an artistic or creative work, so the lighter disclosure rule applies to it.
Does Spotify ban AI music?
Its 25 September 2025 announcement does not describe a ban. It describes AI disclosures in credits, stronger rules against unauthorised voice clones and impersonation, and work against spam; Spotify says it leaves creative decisions to artists.

Sources

Last reviewed by Volkan Çatak, Founder, Proofcan.

Not legal advice. This page explains official texts in plain words and links each one; check the sources, or a lawyer, before relying on it for a decision.