High-risk AI: Article 6 and Annex III.
Reviewed
Short answer
An AI system is high-risk under the AI Act if it is a safety component of a product (or itself a product) that needs third-party conformity assessment under the EU laws listed in Annex I, or if it is used for one of the purposes listed in Annex III, such as recruitment, credit scoring, life and health insurance pricing, education or law enforcement. The obligations apply from 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems and from 2 August 2028 for Annex I systems, as moved by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744.
Official sources: AI Act, Article 6 (consolidated) · AI Act, Annex III (EUR-Lex)
The eight Annex III areas
| Area | Examples of high-risk uses |
|---|---|
| 1. Biometrics | Remote biometric identification (not simple identity verification); categorisation by sensitive attributes; emotion recognition |
| 2. Critical infrastructure | Safety components in critical digital infrastructure, road traffic, or water, gas, heating or electricity supply |
| 3. Education and vocational training | Admission and assignment; evaluating learning outcomes; assessing the appropriate level of education; monitoring students during tests |
| 4. Employment and workers’ management | Recruitment and selection, including targeted job ads, filtering applications and evaluating candidates; decisions on promotion, termination, task allocation or performance monitoring |
| 5. Essential private and public services | Eligibility for public benefits and services, including healthcare; creditworthiness and credit scores (not fraud detection); risk assessment and pricing in life and health insurance; triage of emergency calls |
| 6. Law enforcement | Risk of becoming a victim; polygraphs; reliability of evidence; risk of offending not solely based on profiling; profiling in investigations |
| 7. Migration, asylum and border control | Polygraphs; risk assessments of persons; examining asylum, visa and residence applications; detecting and identifying persons |
| 8. Justice and democratic processes | Assisting judicial authorities in researching and applying the law; influencing the outcome of elections or voting behaviour |
The Article 6(3) filter
An Annex III system is not high-risk if it does not pose a significant risk of harm to health, safety or fundamental rights, including by not materially influencing decisions, and it meets at least one condition: it performs a narrow procedural task; it improves the result of a completed human activity; it detects decision-making patterns or deviations without replacing or influencing the human assessment without proper review; or it performs a preparatory task for an Annex III assessment. A system that profiles natural persons is always high-risk. The provider must document the assessment before placing the system on the market and register it (Articles 6(4), 49(2)).
What providers must do
- A risk management system (Article 9).
- Data and data governance for training, validation and testing data (Article 10).
- Technical documentation with at least the elements of Annex IV; SMEs and small mid-caps may use a simplified form (Article 11).
- Record-keeping (Article 12) and transparency and instructions for use for deployers (Article 13).
- Human oversight (Article 14), and accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity (Article 15).
- A quality management system, proportionate to the provider’s size (Article 17).
- A conformity assessment (Article 43), an EU declaration of conformity (Article 47) and the CE marking (Article 48).
- Registration in the EU database before placing an Annex III system on the market (Article 49).
- Post-market monitoring (Article 72) and reporting of serious incidents (Article 73).
What deployers must do
- Use the system according to its instructions and assign human oversight to people with the competence, training, authority and support needed (Article 26(1), (2)).
- Where they control the input data, make sure it is relevant and sufficiently representative (Article 26(4)); monitor operation and inform the provider of risks (Article 26(5)).
- Keep the automatically generated logs under their control for at least six months, unless other law says otherwise (Article 26(6)).
- Employers inform workers’ representatives and affected workers before using a high-risk system at the workplace (Article 26(7)); public authorities register their use (Article 26(8)).
- Use the provider’s information for the GDPR data protection impact assessment, where one is required (Article 26(9)).
- Fundamental rights impact assessment (Article 27) before first use, for bodies governed by public law, private entities providing public services, and deployers of credit scoring and life or health insurance pricing systems (Annex III, points 5(b) and (c)); not for critical infrastructure systems.
Guidance and dates
Article 6(5) asked the Commission for guidelines with practical examples by 2 February 2026; it published a draft on 19 May 2026, which is still a draft on its page (draft guidelines). The obligations apply from 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems and 2 August 2028 for Annex I systems; systems already on the market are covered only if their design changes significantly, except those intended for public authorities, which must comply by 2 August 2030.
Questions
- Is AI used in recruitment high-risk?
- Yes: Annex III, point 4(a) lists AI systems intended for the recruitment or selection of people, in particular to place targeted job adverts, analyse and filter applications and evaluate candidates. The obligations apply from 2 December 2027, unless the Article 6(3) filter applies, which never covers systems that profile people.
- Is a medical AI device high-risk?
- It can be, through the Annex I route: the EU medical device regulations are listed in Annex I, and an AI system that is a safety component of such a product, or the product itself, is high-risk when the product needs a third-party conformity assessment. Those obligations apply from 2 August 2028.
Sources
- AI Act, Article 6: Classification rules for high-risk AI systemsEuropean Commission, AI Act Service Desk (AI Act Explorer)Consolidated text as at 27 July 2026 (includes the Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), shown in the Commission’s AI Act Explorer.read
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act), Annex III — high-risk areas (not amended by 2026/1744)EUR-Lex / Official Journal of the EURead on 2 November 2026 from the EU Publications Office’s copy of the Official Journal text (publications.europa.eu, same act); EUR-Lex blocks scripted fetches.read
- AI Act, Article 26: Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systemsEuropean Commission, AI Act Service Desk (AI Act Explorer)Consolidated text as at 27 July 2026 (includes the Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), shown in the Commission’s AI Act Explorer.read
- AI Act, Article 27: Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systemsEuropean Commission, AI Act Service Desk (AI Act Explorer)Consolidated text as at 27 July 2026 (includes the Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), shown in the Commission’s AI Act Explorer.read
- AI Act, Article 49: RegistrationEuropean Commission, AI Act Service Desk (AI Act Explorer)Consolidated text as at 27 July 2026 (includes the Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), shown in the Commission’s AI Act Explorer.read
- AI Act, Article 113: Entry into force and applicationEuropean Commission, AI Act Service Desk (AI Act Explorer)Consolidated text as at 27 July 2026 (includes the Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), shown in the Commission’s AI Act Explorer.read
- AI Act, Article 111: AI systems and models already placed on the marketEuropean Commission, AI Act Service Desk (AI Act Explorer)Consolidated text as at 27 July 2026 (includes the Digital Omnibus, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744), shown in the Commission’s AI Act Explorer.read
- Draft Commission guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems (published 19 May 2026, draft)European Commissionread
- AI Act — the Commission’s overview (risk levels and dates)European Commissionread
Last reviewed by Volkan Çatak, Founder, Proofcan.
Not legal advice. This page explains official texts in plain words and links each one; check the sources, or a lawyer, before relying on it for a decision.