PricingLog in

AI Act in Denmark.

Denmark’s Act no. 467 of 14 May 2025 supplements the AI Regulation and designates Digitaliseringsstyrelsen, Datatilsynet and Domstolsstyrelsen as national competent authorities.

Official sources

Act no. 467: scope

Law

Retsinformation’s text of the Act (in Danish): it supplements Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.

“Loven supplerer Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2024/1689 af 13. juni 2024 om harmoniserede regler for kunstig intelligens”

National competent authorities

Authority

Same text: the three authorities named as national competent authorities under Article 70(1).

“Digitaliseringsstyrelsen, Datatilsynet og Domsstolsstyrelsen udpeges som nationale kompetente myndigheder, jf. artikel 70, stk. 1, i forordningen om kunstig intelligens.”

Status and limits

  • The text we read does not say which authority supervises Article 50 transparency obligations specifically.
  • The printout we read was dated 6 October 2026 and showed the Act as in force (“Gældende”).

The EU rule itself

Article 50 of the AI Act is an EU rule that applies in every member state; national laws add authorities and procedures. See what Article 50 requires and the 2 December 2026 deadline.

Questions

Which authority supervises the AI Act in Denmark?
According to the sources we read — National competent authorities: Same text: the three authorities named as national competent authorities under Article 70(1).
Is there a national AI Act law or draft in Denmark?
Act no. 467: scope: Retsinformation’s text of the Act (in Danish): it supplements Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
Is there official guidance on Article 50 in Denmark?
We did not find country-specific official guidance on Article 50 for Denmark in the sources we read.

This page reports what the cited sources say on the date shown. It is not an assessment of anyone’s product, it is not legal advice, and Proofcan does not guarantee compliance. Spotted something out of date? Write to support@proofcan.com.

Sources

Page reviewed . Proofcan is a technical tool, not legal advice, and does not guarantee compliance.